|
SATAN
AND HIS WHISPERING
Who
is Satan and why was he created?
The
jinn we know as Satan was created
from fire. Before his obedience and
sincerity were tested through Adam,
he had been in the company of
angels, acting and worshipping as
they did. Unlike angels, however,
who cannot rebel against God (66:6),
Satan (called Iblis prior to
his test) was free to choose his own
path of conduct. When God tested him
and angels by commanding them to
prostrate before Adam, the seeds of
his self-conceit and disobedience
blossomed and swallowed him. He
replied in his vanity: “I am
better than him. You created me from
fire, whilst him you did create of
clay” (38:76).
Satan
was created for important purposes.
If Satan, who continually tries to
seduce us, did not exist, our
creation would be meaningless and
futile. God has innumerable servants
who, like angels, cannot rebel and
thus do whatever they are told. In
fact, the existence of an absolute
Divine Being Who has many beautiful
Names and Attributes requires, not
because of some external necessity
but because of the essential nature
of his Names, that His Names be
manifest. He manifests all of these
Names through humanity.
Since
He has free will, He also gave us
free will so that we could know good
from evil. In addition, God gave us
great potentials. It is our
development of these potentials and
the struggle to choose between good
an evil that cause us to experience
a constant battle in both our inner
and outer worlds. Just as God sends
hawks upon sparrows so that the
latter will develop their potential
to escape, He created Satan and
allowed him to tempt us so that our
resistance of temptation will raise
us spiritually and strengthen our
willpower. Just as hunger stimulates
human beings and animals to further
exertion and discovery of new ways
to be satisfied, and fear inspires
new defenses, so Satan’s
temptations cause us to develop our
potentials and guard against sin.
Angels
do not rise to the higher spiritual
ranks, because Satan cannot tempt
them and cause them to deviate.
Animals also have fixed stations,
and so cannot attain a higher or a
lower station. Only human beings can
change their station by rising to
the highest rank or falling to the
lowest rank.
Is
the creation of Satan evil?
There
is an infinitely long line of
spiritual evolution between the
ranks of the greatest Prophets and
saints down to those of people like
Pharaoh and Nimrod. Therefore, it
cannot be claimed that the creation
of Satan is evil. Although Satan is
evil and serves various important
purposes, God’s creation involves
the whole universe and should be
understood in relation to the
results, not only with respect to
the acts themselves. Whatever God
does or creates is good and
beautiful in itself or in its
effects. For example, rain and fire
are very useful. But they also can
cause great harm when abused.
Therefore, one cannot claim that the
creation of water and fire is not
totally good. It is the same with
the creation of Satan. His main
purpose is to cause us to develop
our potential, strengthen our
willpower by resisting his
temptations, and then rise to higher
spiritual ranks.
To
the argument made by some that Satan
leads many people to unbelief and
subsequent punishment in Hell, I
reply:
First,
although Satan was created for
many good, universal purposes, many
people may be deceived by him. But
Satan only whispers and suggests; he
cannot force you to indulge in evil
and sin. If you are so weak that
Satan’s false promises deceive
you, and you allow yourself to be
dragged down by him, you earn the
punishment of Hell by misusing an
important God-given faculty that
enables you to develop your
potential and raise to the highest
rank. You must use your free will,
which makes you human and gives you
the highest position in creation,
properly and to further your
intellectual and spiritual
evolution. Otherwise, you must
complain about being honored with
free will and therefore about being
human.
Second,
as quality is much more important
than quantity, we should consider
qualitative, as opposed to
quantitative, values when making our
judgment. For example, 100 date
seeds are worth only 100 cents as
long as they are not planted to grow
into palm trees. If only 20 out of
100 seeds grow into trees due to the
other 80 being destroyed by too much
water, can we argue that it is an
evil to plant and water seeds? I
think all of us can agree that it is
wholly good to have 20 trees in
exchange for 20 seeds, since 20
trees will produce 20,000 seeds.
Again,
100 peacock eggs may be worth 500
cents. But if only 20 eggs hatch and
the rest to do not, who will say
that it is wrong to risk 80 eggs
being spoiled in return for 20
peacocks? On the contrary, it is
wholly good to have 20 peacocks at
the expense of 80 eggs, for those 20
peacocks will lay even more eggs.
It
is the same with humanity. By
fighting Satan and their
evil-commanding self, many “worthless”
people have been lost in exchange
for hundreds of thousands of
Prophets, millions of saints, and
billions of men and women of wisdom
and knowledge, sincerity and good
morals. All of these people are the
sun, moon, and stars of the human
world.
Evil
thoughts, fancies, and ideas that
occur to us involuntarily are
usually the result of Satan’s
whispering. Like a battery’s two
poles, there are two central points
or poles in the human heart (by “heart”
we mean the seat or center of
spiritual intellect). One receives
angelic inspiration, and the other
is vulnerable to Satan’s
whispering.
When
believers deepen their belief and
devotion, and if they are scrupulous
and delicate in feeling, Satan
attacks them from different
directions. He does not tempt those
who follow him voluntarily and
indulge in all that is transitory,
but usually seeks out those sincere,
devout believers trying to rise to
higher spiritual ranks. He whispers
new, original ideas to sinful
unbelievers, in the name of
unbelief, and teaches them how to
struggle against true religion and
those who follow it.
The
meaning of Satan’s coming upon
people from different directions
We
read in Qur’an 7:17 that when God
cursed Satan because of his haughty
disobedience, Satan asked for a
respite until the Day of Judgment so
that he could seduce human beings.
God allowed him to do so, as was
discussed above, and Satan retorted:
“Then
I shall came upon them from before
and behind, from their right and
their left, and You will not find
most of them grateful.”
The
verse means that Satan does
everything he can to seduce us. We
are very complex beings, for God has
manifested all of His Names on us.
This world is an arena of testing,
where we are trained so that we can
serve as a mirror to God and earn
eternal happiness. God has endowed
us with innumerable feelings,
faculties, and potentials to be
trained and developed. If certain
feelings and faculties (e.g.,
intellect, anger, greed, obstinacy,
and lust) are not trained and
directed to lofty goals, but rather
are misused to pursue disagreeable
purposes, and if our natural desires
and animal appetites are not
restricted and satisfied in lawful
ways, they have the potential to
cause us great harm here and in the
Hereafter.
Satan
approaches us from the left and
tries, working on our animal aspect
and our feelings and faculties, to
lead us into all sorts of sin and
evil. When he approaches us from the
front, he causes us to despair of
our future, whispers that the Day of
Judgment will never come, and that
whatever religions say about the
Hereafter is mere fiction. He also
suggests that religion is outdated
and obsolete, and thus of no use for
those who are living now or who will
live in the future. When he comes
upon us from behind, he tries to
make us deny Prophethood and other
essentials of belief, like God’s
existence and Unity, Divine
Scriptures and angels. Through his
whispers and suggestions, Satan
tries to sever completely our
contact with religion and lead us
into sin.
Satan
can only successfully seduce devout,
practicing believers by coming upon
them from their right and tempting
them to ego and pride in their
virtues and good deeds. He whispers
that they are wonderful believers,
and gradually causes them to fall
through self-conceit and the desire
to be praised for their good deeds.
For example, if believers perform
supererogatory late-night prayer (tahajjud)
and then proclaim it so that others
will praise them, and if they
attribute their accomplishments and
good deeds to themselves and
criticize others in secret, they
have fallen under Satan’s
influence. This is a perilous
temptation for believers, and so
they must be incessantly alert to
Satan’s coming upon them from
their right.
Another
of Satan’s tricks is to cause
unimportant things to appear
important, and vice versa. If
believers dispute among themselves
in the mosque over a secondary
matter, such as whether one can use
a rosary when glorifying God after
the daily prescribed prayers, while
their children are being dragged
along ways of unbelief and
materialism or are drowning in the
swamp of immorality, Satan has
seduced them.
Satan’s
whispering disagreeable thoughts and
fancies
This
comprises five cures for five wounds
of the heart.
In
the name of God, the Merciful,
the Compassionate.
O
Lord, I take refuge in You
from the evil suggestions of
the devils, and I take refuge
in You, O my Lord, lest they
attend me.
If
Satan cannot seduce devout
believers, he whispers disagreeable
thoughts and fancies to them. For
example, by associating some ideas
with others, he makes believers have
some unpleasant conceptions of the
Divine Being, or conceive of
unbelief or disobedience. If they
dwell on such ideas, Satan pesters
them until they fall into doubt
about their belief or despair of
ever leading a virtuous life.
Another trick is to cause good,
devout believers to suspect the
correctness or validity of their
religious acts. For example: Did I
perform my prayer correctly? Did I
wash hands or face completely while
performing the ritual ablution? How
many times did I washed the parts of
my body that must be washed?
O
you, who are afflicted with the
distress of involuntary evil
thoughts and fancies! Do you know
what the evil thoughts occurring to
you involuntarily resemble? A
misfortune! The more you dwell on
and attach importance to them, the
more they grow. If you attach no
importance to them, they dwindle
away; if you exaggerate them, they
swell; if you belittle them, they
die down. If you fear them, they
become grave and make you ill; if
you do not fear them, they are
slight and remain hidden. If you do
not know their real nature, they
persist and become established; if
you recognize their nature, they
disappear. So, out of many types or
aspects of these pestilential evil
thoughts or fancies, I will explain
only five, which occur most
frequently. I hope that it will be
curative for you and for me, for
such thoughts and fancies are of a
kind that ignorance attracts them
and knowledge repulses them. If you
do not recognize them they call on
you; if you do recognize them they
depart.
First
aspect
Satan
first casts a doubt into the heart.
If the heart does not admit it, he
passes on to offer blasphemy, and
brings back to the mind some unclean
memories and pictures and some
unmannerly, ugly scenes, which
resemble blasphemy, causing the
heart to wail ‘Alas!,’ and fall
into despair. The person suffering
from such evil thoughts supposes
that he is acting wrongfully towards
his Lord and feels terrible
agitation and anxiety. In order to
be freed from it, he flees from the
Divine Presence and wants to plunge
into heedlessness and forgetfulness.
The cure for this wound is the
following:
Listen,
you poor fellow, it is from
involuntary evil fancies that you
are suffering! Do not be alarmed!
For what comes to your mind is not
blasphemy, but something imaginary.
As an involuntary fancy of unbelief
is not unbelief, an involuntary
fancy of blasphemy is not blasphemy.
For according to logic, a fancy is
not an act of judgment, whereas
blasphemy (a willful act) is an act
of judgment. Moreover, the ugly
words occurring to you do not come
out of your heart, because your
heart is displeased with and
regretful of them. Rather they come
from ‘the tube of Satan,’ an
inner faculty situated near the
heart through which Satan whispers
to the heart. The harm of
involuntary evil fancies comes from
imagining them to be harmful, the
person suffers harm by heart through
imagining them to be harmful. For he
supposes a fancy not subject to
judgment to be reality. Also, he
ascribes a work of Satan to his own
heart; he supposes Satan’s
whisperings to belong to his own
heart. He thinks this is harmful, so
he suffers harm-which is just what
Satan wants.
Second
aspect
When
conceptions arise in the heart, they
enter the imagination without form;
it is in the imagination that they
take on a form. The faculty of
imagination, always under some
prompting, weaves forms of some
sort. It weaves around the forms of
the things to which it attaches
importance; whatever conception
comes to the heart, the imagination
either clothes it in these forms, or
attaches them to it, or touches it
with them, or veils it through them.
If the conception is pure and clean,
and the forms dirty and base, there
is some little contact between them
but the pure conception will not
accept the base form as its dress.
However, the man suffering from
involuntary evil thoughts confuses
that little contact with being
dressed, and exclaims, ‘Alas! How
corrupted my heart is! This baseness
and meanness will drive me out of
religion!’ Satan takes advantage
of this sentiment. The cure for this
wound is as follows:
Listen,
you poor fellow! Just as your
outward cleanliness, which is the
means to correctness of your
prayers, is not affected or spoiled
by the foulness in your intestines,
so too the sacred meanings or
conceptions are not harmed by being
close to unclean forms. Suppose you
are reflecting on the signs of God
in the universe or on the verses of
the Qur’an. Suddenly you feel ill,
or you feel a desire to eat, or an
urge to pass water. Of course your
imagination will form whatever is
needed to respond to the illness or
the need, and weave ‘lowly’
forms appropriate to the purpose.
The meanings that arise out of your
(interrupted) reflections will pass
by the forms your imagination has
been prompted to weave. But there is
no harm in that passing, no soiling
from it, nor error, nor injury. If
there is any fault, it lies in
paying attention to the fact and
imagining it to be harmful.
Third
aspect
There
are certain hidden connections
between things. Even between things
you never expect to be connected
there are ‘threads’ of
connection. They are either there in
fact, or your imagination makes them
according to its preoccupation, and
ties those things together. It is
because of this connection that
sometimes seeing a sacred thing
brings to mind an unclean thing. As
the science of rhetoric puts it, ‘opposition
which is the cause of remoteness in
the outer world, is the cause of
nearness in the imagination.’ That
is, the means of bringing together
the forms of two opposites, is
imaginary connection. The
recollection occurring through such
a connection is called the
association of ideas.
For
example, while performing the
prayers or reciting supplications
before the Ka‘ba, in the Divine
Presence, although you are
reflecting on Qur’anic verses, the
association of ideas may take you to
the furthest, lowest trifles. If you
are afflicted with such involuntary
association of ideas, do not be
alarmed. Rather, when you come to
your senses, turn back. Do not say,
‘What great wrong I have done!,’
nor dwell on it to learn its nature,
lest, through your attentiveness to
it, that weak connection finds
strength. For as you show regret and
consider it seriously, that weak
recollection of yours becomes a
fixation and turns into a sickness
of imagination. Do not be
over-distressed-it is not a sickness
of the heart. This type of
recollection is mostly involuntary,
and especially common among
sensitive, nervous people. Satan
works a great deal out of the mine
of this type of involuntary fancies.
The cure for this wound is as
follows:
The
association of ideas is mostly
involuntary. One is not responsible
for it. In addition, in association
there is proximity, not contact and
combination. By nature, ideas are
not contagious, they do not harm
each other. Satan and the angel of
inspiration being in proximity to
each other around the heart, and
sinners and the pious being side by
side in the same house, do not cause
harm. So too if, due to the
association of ideas, unclean
fancies enter among your pure
thoughts, they cause no harm, unless
they are intentional, or by
imagining them to be harmful, one
becomes over-attentive to them.
Sometimes it happens that the heart
becomes tired out, and the mind, in
order to entertain itself, occupies
itself with anything that flits
across it. Satan takes this as an
opportunity, and offers unclean
things to it.
Fourth
aspect
There
is a kind of involuntary fancy which
arises from seeking the best form of
a religious deed, and can be better
called a ‘scruple.’ If the
person supposes it to be a true or
pure piety, it becomes more vigorous
and makes the resulting condition
more severe. It can reach such a
degree that while searching for even
better forms of deed, the person
falls into what is forbidden.
Sometimes it happens that in seeking
after what is commended in worship,
the person neglects what is
obligatory therein. Hesitating over
whether his act of worship was
canonically acceptable or not, he
repeats it. This state continues,
and soon he falls into despair.
Satan takes advantage of this state,
and wounds him. There are two cures
for this wound.
The
first cure: A scruple of this kind
may be right for the Mu’tazilites.
For they argue: ‘Deeds and things
for which man is held responsible by
religion are, either of themselves
and in regard to the Hereafter,
good, and because they are good they
were commanded, or they are bad, and
because they are bad they were
prohibited.’ That means, from the
point of view of reality and the
Hereafter, things are good or bad in
their essence, and the Divine
command and prohibition are
dependent on this. Following this
school of thought, in every act of
worship the scruple arises: ‘I
wonder if I would succeed in
performing this act according to the
essential good in it!’ However,
the Ahl al-Sunna wa’l-Jama‘a,
people of the school representing
the great majority of Muslims who
are believed to be on the right
path, argue: ‘Almighty God orders
a thing, and it becomes good: He
prohibits a thing, and it becomes
bad.’ That means, whether a thing
is good or bad is dependent on
divine command and prohibition:
whatever God orders, it is good,
whatever He prohibits it is bad.
Therefore,
a thing is good or bad for a person
who is religiously charged with
doing it only after he has become
aware that he has done something
ordered or prohibited. Moreover, a
thing is religiously good or bad not
in respect to its apparent
correctness and its apparent
features, but with respect to the
Hereafter.
For
example, you did wudu (ritual
ablution) and did the prayer, which
were essentially imperfect due to
some reason that would invalidate
both (like your garment being
ritually unclean because of some
amount of foul substance). Since you
had been completely unaware of that
reason before, your ablution and
prayer are sound and good. However,
the Mu’tazilites oppose: ‘In
essence they were bad and unsound.
But they may be accepted from you
because you were ignorant of the
reason, and your ignorance is an
excuse.’ According to the school
of Ahl al-Sunna wa’l-Jama‘a,
then, you should not indulge in
scruples about a deed you performed
in conformity with the commandments
of the Shari‘a, nor worry
excessively about whether it was
sound or not. Rather, you should say
in the form of a question, ‘Was it
accepted?’ That is, do not become
proud and conceited (because of the
good deeds you have done).
The
second cure: There is no difficulty
in religion. The four schools of
conduct are on the right path, and
realizing a fault which leads to the
seeking of forgiveness is
preferable-for the person afflicted
with scruples-to seeing deeds as
good, which leads to pride. Then, it
is better if such a person sees his
deed as faulty and asks for God’s
forgiveness, rather than seeing it
as good and becoming proud. Give up
your scruples and say to Satan: ‘This
is merely a difficulty. It is
difficult to be aware of the truth
in everything.’ Excessive anxiety
is an attitude contrary to the
principle: There is no difficulty in
religion, and Religion is facility.
Surely a deed of mine, if it
conforms with the requirements of an
established school of conduct, is
enough for me. After that, in
confession of my inadequacy, there
is a means of taking refuge with
Divine Compassion, in humbly
entreating forgiveness for the duty
of worship which I cannot perform in
a way worthy of it, and of meekly
supplicating that my defective deeds
be accepted.
Fifth
aspect
Some
suffer scruples in the form of [what
they think are] doubts in matters of
belief. The unhappy person suffering
from such scruples will sometimes
confuse a passing fancy with a
conceptualized idea. That is, he
supposes a doubt that has
unintentionally occurred to him to
be a real doubt which he himself has
conceived. Then he worries that his
faith is impaired: that is, he
supposes the fancy of a doubt to be
a real doubt that damages faith.
Sometimes he thinks that a doubt
that perturbed him while thinking is
something that impairs his rational,
conscious confirmation of the
essentials of faith. Sometimes he
supposes reflecting on a matter
pertaining to unbelief to be itself
unbelief. That is, he supposes the
exercises of the reflective faculty,
study and objective reasoning, to
understand the causes of unbelief,
to be contrary to belief. Thus,
frightened by these suppositions,
which result from the whispering of
Satan, he exclaims: ‘Alas! My
heart is corrupted and my faith
impaired.’ Since those states are
mostly involuntary, and he is unable
to put them right by his free will,
he falls into despair. The cure for
this wound is as follows:
Just
as imagining unbelief is not
unbelief, neither is reflecting on
unbelief, unbelief. Just as
picturing misguidance in mind is not
misguidance, neither is reflecting
on misguidance, misguidance.
Imagining, fancying,
picturing-in-the-mind, and
reflecting, are all different from
confirmation by reason and
acceptance by heart. They are only
voluntary to a degree; it is
difficult to place them under the
control of the free will and so make
oneself answerable for them as for
religious obligations. By contrast,
confirmation and acceptance are
deliberate; they depend on certain
criteria and intentional reasoning.
In addition, just as imagining,
fancying, mental pictures and
reflection, are not mental
activities of the same kind as
confirmation and acceptance, neither
are they to be considered as the
same as doubt and hesitation. Only
if they are repeated unnecessarily
and become established, may they
pave the way to a sort of real
doubt. Also, on the pretext of
objective reasoning or fairness,
continuously taking the part of the
opposing side may go so far that a
person involuntarily favors the
opposing side. His support of the
truth, which is incumbent upon him,
is shaken, and himself falls into
danger. Gradually, he has a fixed
state of mind and becomes an
officious advocate of Satan or the
enemy.
The
most important of this kind of
scruple is this: the man afflicted
with it confuses something which is
theoretically possible with
something which is reasonably
likely. That is, if he sees
something to be theoretically
possible, he imagines that it is
reasonable for it to be or to
happen. Whereas one of the
principles of reasoning in theology
is that a theoretical possibility
does not negate certain knowledge of
a present reality nor contradict the
demands of reason. For example, it
is theoretically possible that the
Black Sea could sink into the earth
at this moment; it is something that
could happen. But we judge with
certainty that that the Black Sea is
in its place, we know this without
any doubt. That theoretical
possibility of its being otherwise
causes us no real doubt and does not
impair our certainty about the
present reality. Again, for example,
it is possible that the sun will not
set today or that it will not rise
tomorrow. But this possibility does
not impair our certainty and does
not give rise to any real doubt. So,
baseless suspicions arising from
theoretical possibilities of this
sort-for example, about the setting
of the life of this world and rising
of the life of the Hereafter, which
are among the truths of faith-do not
impair the certainty of belief.
Moreover, the well known rule, a
possibility that does not arise from
any evidence is not worth
consideration is one of the
established principles of the
sciences of the foundations of
religion and of jurisprudence.
If
you ask:
‘What
is the divine purpose in allowing
involuntary evil thoughts and
scruples to pester us, seeing that
they are so harmful and an
affliction for believers?’
Answer:
On condition they are not carried to
excess and allowed to overwhelm the
person, essentially they are the
cause of vigilance and awareness,
lead to seeking the truth and that
which is better, and are the means
to seriousness. They disperse
indifference and repel carelessness.
For this reason, in this realm of
trial and testing and arena of
competition, the Absolutely Wise One
gave them to the hand of Satan as a
whip of encouragement for us. He
strikes it at the heads of human
beings. If it hurts excessively, one
should complain to the All-Wise and
Compassionate One, and say: ‘I
seek refuge with God from the
accursed Satan.’
|
|